This website uses cookies to give you the best experience. By using this website you agree to these cookies being set. You can read how we use cookies and how you can control them in our Cookie Notice.

How much to buy-in for

Buying in big gives you a lot of power, but a short stack can give you a tactical edge. So which is better? Here, we walk you through the pros and cons of buying in for different amounts, including:

When a minimum buy-in is useful

Traditionally, short-stack poker has always been the strategy of choice for players hoping to win big without getting in too deep. And if you’re playing at a strong table (a loose-aggressive six-hander for example) sometimes it’s not a bad idea to buy in with less.

Imagine you’re playing in a $2/$4 no-limit game. The maximum buy-in is $400, but you buy in at $200 instead. This gives you plenty of breathing space, but a big bet or all-in is still going to give your opponents pause for thought. It can also help you stay out of trouble.

Say you find yourself with A♥ K♦ on the button and raise to $16. The big blind (an aggressive type) re-raises to $48. If you had more chips at the table, you’d be in a tough spot here. You’d find it difficult to call, because unless you flopped an ace or a king, and he raised again, that’s it – you’d have to fold.

But with a short stack, you can simply push all-in. Unless your opponent has a huge hand, they’ll probably fold.

A small stack gives you a different playing mentality – and that’s no bad thing. For that reason, you might want to buy in small for a while before trying a deep-stacked game.

When to buy in at the maximum amount

If you’re on top form and think you have the edge over other players at the table, maximum buy-in is the way to go. Then when your opponents start making mistakes, you can go ahead and win their whole stack.

Deep stacks are better for post-flop play too, when you might be up against different drawing hands.

Let's say you raise to $8 with 10♣ 10♥ on the button at a $1/$2 table. Three players call, and the flop brings 10♦ J♦ 4♠. Lovely. The small blind bets out for the full pot of $32 and (surprise), both the big blind and the mid-position limper call. The pot is now $128 and you have $192 left.

Here’s where you make your move. By going all-in, you’re protecting your hand from danger cards on further streets. The other players – who probably have draws – think they can take you on. Big mistake.

So, just to recap:

With a minimum buy-in

  1. Decisions are easier. Instead of getting raised out, just go all-in. Done.
  2. You get paid more often, as deeper-stacks can afford to see your cards.
  3. Fewer starting hands means simpler play – great for multi-tabling.

With a maximum buy-in

  1. You can challenge people with marginal hands.
  2. You can protect your big hands and pressure people into making mistakes.
  3. You can invest in your table image so that a big flop really pays off - and get away with big bluffs (as no-one’s in a position to call you).

As always, it depends on the situation and who you’re playing against.